Commence Part 2… Credit: Buy it in print, canvas or shirt form here. So, I may have misspoke. On one hand, it can be said that the novel is about many things:
A Journal of Mormon Scripture 29 Textual Studies of the Doctrine and Covenants: The Plural Marriage Revelation is a textual study of Section Review of William Victor Smith.
Greg Kofford Books,pp. Section is perhaps one of the most complex and controversial in the Doctrine and Covenants, and various articles, essays, and books have attempted to study the revelation within a historical and social context.
Smith has produced a textual analysis and has provided some very interesting and enlightening information, which readers will certainly enjoy.
Scholars and their works reflect certain worldviews and idiosyncrasies, and the idea of being completely neutral is more fantasy than reality.
Usually, the best scholars and authors can do is to recognize their biases, address them, and at least acknowledge differing points [Page ]of view, even if only to show where they disagree. These problems can be distilled down to several issues: I will address each of these issues.
In one case, I was astounded not at what he included in his analysis but what he did not include. The above was not shocking and certainly did not plow new ground in the history of LDS plural marriage. The Southern Utah Years, These thoughts are similar in some ways to a discussion in The Persistence of Polygamy: Joseph Smith and the Origins of Mormon Polygamy of how the sealing ordinances would connect the Saints to each other.
The concept of family extended to more distant relations; as well as went beyond the grave and became multigenerational.
This was eventually accentuated even further by the numerous and intricate family relationships created through plural marriage. Ignoring or Misunderstanding Aspects of History In at least a handful of instances, Smith appears to have misunderstood aspects of Mormon history and doctrine.
That would give an incorrect impression or suggestion of nineteenth-century Mormon fanaticism and a level of violence dissimilar to the rest of the nation — particularly over sexual crimes like adultery. That simply was not the case; it is a misrepresentation of history. In most of nineteenth-century America, crimes such as adultery and seduction were looked upon with abhorrence.
While legal statutes might not have been as severe, extra-legal justice could range from tarring and feathering to beating and whipping, being ridden out of town on a rail, and even castration or death. In addition, the forms of death could be rather gruesome. An angry mob took him out and beheaded him.
The Canadian shooting resulted in the death of the adulterer and arrest of the cuckolded husband who was, in turn, found innocent by a jury ruling the killing as justifiable homicide. There are numerous examples of victims of seduction shooting their seducers.
These actions were met with sympathy and approval by much of society, and such sentiments were expressed in more than one news article of the time. They, of course, were the two year-old wives.
The question is why the ages of the year-olds were given when the ages of no other plural wives were provided. I suspect the answer relates to shock value. Why else would their ages be given, other than to assault our twenty-first-century sensitivities?
While the thought of an adult marrying a year old is foreign, even repulsive, to most modern Americans, the historical reality is that early marriage age was not uncommon and was socially acceptable.
In other words, people in the past had a different understanding and definition of childhood, adolescence, and the appropriate age to marry. Unrecognized Bias There are other examples of bias throughout the text, but perhaps the main example is a disdain for plural marriage, which seems to permeate the book.
I could not figure out if the overuse of this phrase was to reinforce the idea that Doctrine and Covenants Section is just the plural marriage revelation which Smith would like to significantly modify or completely expunge from the canon or if he just wanted to reinforce the theme and subtitle of his book.
Either way, the phrase, which appears times in the book, 22 started out as distracting and quickly became annoying. Two pages included the phrase five times, two of them appearing in one sentence right after the other — So intent was the author in pushing this phrase that when quoting Joseph F.John Locke (—) John Locke was among the most famous philosophers and political theorists of the 17 th century.
He is often regarded as the founder of a school of thought known as British Empiricism, and he made foundational contributions to modern theories of limited, liberal government. Whoa! That’s a really good essay, kind of scattered and intense but very interesting and thought-provoking.
I agree that heterosexual love is inherently imbalanced, but why? The Theology, Christology and Pneumatology of the Book of Revelation Essay - The Book of Revelation, or the Apocalypse of John, is a complex and multi-dimensional text that encompasses a great deal of information and from which a large number of interpretations, and misinterpretations, can be drawn.
Light was listed as appearing on day 1, but its source (the sun and stars) did not appear until day 4. Most creation scientists, who generally support the literal interpretation of this creation story, have a . Essay about Reading The Book of Revelation - The Book of Revelation, the final book of the Christian biblical canon, is perhaps one of the most complex and polyvalent biblical texts accessible to modern readers, and has been the source of many differing and divergent interpretations and readings.
W.C. Kaiser, ed., "Hard sayings of the Bible," Intervarsity Press, () Read reviews or order this book safelyJ.C. Laney, "Answers to tough questions from every book of the Bible: A survey of problem passages and issues," Kregal Publ., () Read reviews or order this book safelyJosh McDowell, "The Bible handbook of difficult verses," Harvest House Publishers (), Baker Books () Read.